Are product complaints diverting man power and consuming resources you'd rather spend elsewhere?
Customer returns are an inevitable part of the business, but they need not be an integral part of yours!
MET carry out medical device complaint handling procedures so that you can get on with running your business. Our unique First Line QA service makes it easy to comply with the EU MEDDEV 2.12-1 Rev 5 Guidelines on a medical devices vigilance system, which stipulates that "any manufacturer selling on the European market should make sure that their vigilance systems are updated to meet the revised guidance" (MHRA). These guidelines apply to:
- CE marked medical devices.
- Custom-made medical devices.
- Medical devices whose availability precedes CE marking.
- Other items where an incident occurs leading to corrective action on devices included above.
MET's specialist and confidential medical device complaint handling service provides an effective and simple way of facilitating the management of your product complaints within the UK, leaving you free to concentrate on your value-added activities. It is designed around a structured and time-sensitive processing of your returns. By conducting the original investigation and feeding data back to you rapidly, we enable you to provide a fast response to your end-users and react to technical failures early on. This service can be tailored to your exact requirements and includes:
- Checks against specifications
- Physical diagnostic
- Compliance with standards
- Independent reports
First Line QA is as simple as 1, 2, 3...
- Your marketing system diverts returned products and complaints to us.
- We analyse the complaint, decontaminate the product, and bench test against your specifications.
- You receive an independent report of the product's performance and a quarterly or monthly summary of complaints and trends.
We will classify the complaints according to the new vigilance terminology, notify the Competent Authority (if you have requested this), report our results to you (within agreed timescales), and provide a periodic summary of reports, including trend analysis and recommendations.
The new guidance gives deadlines for reporting incidents:
Type of Incident
Required Reporting Period
|Serious public health threat||Immediate, which means within 2 calendar days of the manufacturer becoming aware of a threat.|
|Death or unanticipated serious deterioration in state of health||Immediately after the manufacturer establishes a link between the event and the device, in any case within a maximum of 10 days of the manufacturer becoming aware of the threat.|
|Other incidents||Immediately after the manufacturer establishes a link between the event and the device, in any case within a maximum of 30 days of the manufacturer becoming aware of the threat.|